In other words, in order for the police’s frisk to be legal, their belief that you might have a weapon must be objectively reasonable, not simply based on a hunch. The key element of this exception is the reasonableness requirement. In other words, if they feel something in your pocket, but they know that the object cannot be a firearm or knife, they cannot pull it out of your pocket and examine it. Under this system, the police have to stop the frisk as soon as they are satisfied that you don’t have a weapon on you. This type of stop and frisk is also called a Terry Stop. They can do this even if they don’t have a valid warrant. If a police officer has a reasonable suspicion that you might be carrying a weapon, they are allowed to pat you down quickly in a search for a firearm or other weapon. However, the Supreme Court has carved out a few important exceptions to this rule. This means that the police cannot search people’s houses or persons without a valid search warrant. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution grants you protection against unreasonable searches and seizures by police. But what if you are not under arrest? What if you are simply walking down the street or are stopped in a traffic stop? Can the police legally search you and seize what they find to use against you in court? Stop and frisk If a police officer arrests you, they can perform a full search of your pockets, personal items and car.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |